X-Andrew-Authenticated-as: 7997;andrew.cmu.edu;Ted Anderson
Received: from hogtown.andrew.cmu.edu via trymail for +dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl@andrew.cmu.edu (->+dist+/afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr11/tm2b/space/space.dl) (->ota+space.digests)
ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr1/ota/Mailbox/gbw4Nxi00WBw01wk57>;
Wed, 27 Mar 91 02:15:10 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <8bw4Nt600WBwI1v04i@andrew.cmu.edu>
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU
From: space-request+@Andrew.CMU.EDU
To: space+@Andrew.CMU.EDU
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 91 02:15:05 -0500 (EST)
Subject: SPACE Digest V13 #305
SPACE Digest Volume 13 : Issue 305
Today's Topics:
STS-1 10th Anniversary Press Briefing (Forwarded)
space news from Feb 11 AW&ST
Space Science Sampler Images with a grid?
Re: MAJOR SOLAR FLARE ALERT (weather reactions?)
Inter-probe communication
Re: "Follies"
Shuttle Status for 03/20/91 (Forwarded)
Re: First Liquid-Fueled Rocket Launching by Goddard - 65th Anniversary
Administrivia:
Submissions to the SPACE Digest/sci.space should be mailed to
space+@andrew.cmu.edu. Other mail, esp. [un]subscription requests,
should be sent to space-request+@andrew.cmu.edu, or, if urgent, to
I was telling my girlfriend's 11-year old cousin about the
probes that exist in outer space; Magellan, the Voyagers, and
Gallileo. He asked me a question I couldn't answer: If something
'went wrong' and a probe lost communications from Earth, could one
spacecraft be given commands from Earth to redirect its radio dish and
relay/forward commands to another probe that couldn't receive commands
from Earth?
Just curious,
Perry Pederson
n8742883@uncorn.wwu.edu
------------------------------
Date: 22 Mar 91 16:37:17 GMT
From: zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!mace.cc.purdue.edu!dil@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (Perry G Ramsey)
Subject: Re: "Follies"
In article <1991Mar21.213140.905@dsd.es.com>, bpendlet@oscar.dsd.es.com (Bob Pendleton) writes:
> In article <7044@mace.cc.purdue.edu>, dil@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Perry G Ramsey) writes:
>
> > Salt Lake City quickly could become self
> > supporting; Luna City won't cut its umbilical for years.
>
> According to my grandfather, whose names is enscribed on the sons of
> the pioneers monument, Salt Lake City was never self supporting. If it
> hadn't been for the '49ers coming through 2 years after the first
> pioneers founded Salt Lake City, the Utah colonists never would have
> survived.
You guys tell all these sad tales to the Indians who lived in the
Salt Lake area or Massachusetts for many years before the Europeans
dropped in and showed them how to exist.
There's fresh water. There (was) abundant wild game. There are
a variety of edible plants, if you know which are which.
Even the deepest desert of southern California supported human
existence before the Europeans dammed the creeks and destroyed the
wildlife. Even the most hostile desert on earth is infinitely
more hospitable than the moon.
That doesn't say that lunar colonization is impossible. It does say
that you aren't going to do it on the cheap, as the original post
claimed. An very well developed transportation infrastructure is essential
if you are going to keep the colonists supplied with the basic
necessities of life. You can't eat moon rocks, no matter how many
important minerals they might contain.
--
Perry G. Ramsey Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
dil@mace.cc.purdue.edu Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN USA
perryr@vm.cc.purdue.edu *** IMAGINE YOUR LOGO HERE ******